Nowadays millions of online shops are doing business and develop rapidly. The majority of traditional shops are concerned if they bankrupt soon due to the fast growing of online shopping. However, some people argue that a great deal of shops can still survive.

Firstly, the online shops always offer a very competitive price in order to obtain more and more consumers. They can always provide attractive promotion and sell the products at bottom price because they do not have to pay the extra rental for the physical shops. For example, in my own country, the daily turnover of Tao Bao online shop is about 10 million, which is an astonishing amount.

Secondly, the people are keen on shopping on the internet because it can save time. Especially young generation is likely to browse the website of the shops at home in a comfortable atmosphere. They may flexibly select the goods that they like without the persuading from the shop staff. They can also compare the prices between various shops thanks to price checking system. However, some people said the traditional shops would still have their opportunities to retain their business. They suggest that the owners of the chain stores or department stores can build up the online shops as well so as to maintain a stable business. Actually, there a lot of shops that have built up their online shops, such as the renowned sports shop Nike.

All in all, it is difficult to say that what is the advantage or disadvantage for online shopping. In my opinion, the owners of business should keep up with the trend and quote a best price for keeping the purchasers.

➡️ Errors and areas of improvement in the essay The candidate has covered all parts of the task but his/her position is not sufficiently clear for a higher band to be awarded. The response focuses on the advantages and disadvantages of online shopping, rather than on whether or not the writer agrees that this type of shopping will result in all shops in towns and cities closing.

Organisation is logical, with appropriate use of cohesive devices and paragraphs and the range of vocabulary shows some less common items and use of collocation [fast growing competitive | keen on | browse the website | price-checking system | retain their business | renowned].

There is a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and the meaning is clear, in spite of some errors.

In today's society, the debate over whether reading for pleasure fosters a better imagination compared to watching TV is a topic of considerable interest. While some argue that reading enhances imaginative abilities, others contend that television viewing can also stimulate creativity. This essay will explore both perspectives before presenting my opinion.

Those who advocate for reading as a means to enhance imagination often highlight the immersive nature of books. When reading, individuals are required to visualize scenes, characters and settings, thereby engaging their imagination. Furthermore, books offer a vast array of genres and styles, allowing readers to explore diverse worlds and perspectives. Through the act of reading, individuals are encouraged to think critically, infer and interpret, all of which contribute to the development of imagination.

On the other hand, proponents of television argue that well-crafted visual storytelling can also ignite the imagination. Television programs, particularly those that are creatively produced, often feature intricate narratives, compelling characters, and imaginative settings. Additionally, visual media can provide a sensory experience that complements the imagination, allowing viewers to immerse themselves in different worlds and scenarios.

In my opinion, while reading undoubtedly offers unique benefits for imagination development, it would be unfair to discount the imaginative potential of television viewing. Both mediums have the capacity to stimulate the imagination in different ways. For some individuals, reading may be more while others may find television equally inspiring. Ultimately, the extent to which reading or watching TV enhances imagination may vary depending on personal preferences and experiences.

In conclusion, the question of whether reading for pleasure leads to a better imagination compared to watching TV is complex and multifaceted. While reading is often praised for its ability to stimulate imagination, television viewing should not be overlooked as a potential source of creative inspiration. Ultimately, individuals should be encouraged to explore a variety of mediums and engage in activities that resonate with their interests and preferences, fostering imagination in diverse ways.
(282 words)

➡️ Why this essay qualifies for a Band 8,5 score:

1. Coherence and Cohesion: The essay is well-structured, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs discussing both perspectives, and a conclusion. The ideas are logically presented, and transition words are used effectively to connect sentences and paragraphs.
2. Task Response: The essay addresses the prompt by discussing the extent to which reading for pleasure leads to a better imagination compared to watching TV. It presents arguments for both perspectives and provides a personal opinion, as required by the task.
3. Lexical Resource: The vocabulary is appropriate for an academic essay.
4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: grammar is appropriate for an academic essay.

➡️ Errors and areas of improvement in the essay

1. In the sentence "Those who advocate for reading as a means to enhance imagination often highlight the immersive nature of books," consider replacing "for reading" with "the benefits of reading" for smoother flow.
2. In the sentence "Television programs, particularly those that are creatively produced, often feature intricate narratives, compelling characters, and imaginative settings," consider adding a comma after "particularly" for clarity.
3. In the sentence "While reading is often praised for its ability to stimulate imagination, television viewing should not be overlooked as a potential source of creative inspiration," consider replacing "television viewing" with "watching TV" to maintain consistency in terminology.

The debate surrounding whether reading for pleasure or watching television fosters a better imagination is a topic of considerable interest in contemporary discourse. While some argue that reading enhances imaginative abilities, others assert that television viewing can also stimulate creativity. This essay will critically examine both viewpoints before presenting a nuanced perspective.

Advocates of reading as a means to enhance imagination often highlight the immersive nature of books. Through reading, individuals are compelled to conjure vivid mental images of scenes, characters, and settings, thereby actively engaging their imagination. Moreover, the diverse array of genres and narrative styles offered by literature enables readers to traverse a spectrum of imaginative realms and perspectives. Consequently, the cognitive processes involved in reading, such as critical thinking, inference, and interpretation, are believed to significantly contribute to the cultivation of imaginative faculties.

Conversely, proponents of television argue that well-crafted visual storytelling can be equally potent in stimulating the imagination. Television programs, particularly those characterized by innovative storytelling techniques, intricate narratives, and captivating characters, possess the capacity to transport viewers to fantastical worlds and evoke profound emotional responses. Furthermore, the sensory immersion facilitated by visual media serves to enhance the imaginative experience, allowing viewers to vicariously inhabit diverse scenarios and environments.

In my view, while reading undeniably offers unique benefits for nurturing imagination, it is erroneous to disregard the imaginative potential of television consumption. Both media possess distinct strengths in fostering imaginative engagement, with reading excelling in cognitive immersion and critical reflection, while television complements this by offering sensory stimulation and emotional resonance. Ultimately, the extent to which an individual's imagination is enriched by either medium is contingent upon personal predispositions, experiences, and preferences.

In conclusion, the debate surrounding the comparative influence of reading and television on imaginative development is multifaceted and nuanced. While reading is celebrated for its cognitive and intellectual benefits, television should not be discounted as a valuable source of imaginative inspiration. Embracing a diverse range of media experiences is essential for fostering creativity and enriching the imaginative landscape of individuals.

In modern global situation, the practice of providing children with pocket money on a weekly basis is a subject of debate. While some argue that this habit fosters responsible money management skills in adulthood, others question its efficacy. This essay will critically examine both perspectives before presenting my opinion.

Proponents of giving children pocket money assert that it instills valuable financial habits from a young age, thereby facilitating better money management skills in adulthood. By receiving a regular allowance, children are given the opportunity to budget, save and make informed spending decisions. This hands-on experience with money empowers them to understand the value of budgeting and saving, thus laying a foundation for responsible financial behavior later in life.

Conversely, skeptics argue that providing children with pocket money may not necessarily translate to better money management skills in adulthood. They contend that the amount of pocket money given may not be sufficient to impart meaningful lessons about financial responsibility. Additionally, the absence of guidance on how to use pocket money effectively may result in children developing poor spending habits or failing to understand the importance of saving for the future.

In my opinion, while giving children pocket money can serve as a useful tool for teaching financial responsibility, its effectiveness depends on various factors. The amount of pocket money provided, along with the guidance and support offered by parents or guardians, plays a crucial role in shaping children's attitudes towards money. Moreover, supplementary financial education programs or discussions about budgeting and saving can complement the practice of giving pocket money and enhance its impact on children's financial literacy.

In conclusion, while some believe that providing children with pocket money every week can help them develop better money management skills as adults, others remain skeptical about its effectiveness. Ultimately, the extent to which pocket money influences financial behaviour in adulthood depends on factors such as the amount given, parental guidance, and additional financial education. Therefore, while giving pocket money may be beneficial, it should be accompanied by appropriate guidance and support to maximise its potential impact on children's financial well-being.
(279 words)

➡️ Why this essay qualifies for a Band 9 score:

1. Coherence and Cohesion: The essay is well-organized, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs discussing both perspectives, and a conclusion. The ideas are logically presented, and transition words are used effectively to connect sentences and paragraphs, enhancing coherence.
2. Task Response: The essay addresses the prompt by discussing the extent to which giving children pocket money affects their ability to manage money as adults. It presents arguments for both perspectives and provides a personal opinion, as required by the task.
3. Lexical Resourse: The vocabulary is appropriate for an academic essay.
4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The grammar is appropriate for an academic essay.

Nowadays, the practice of providing children with weekly pocket money is subject to scrutiny regarding its impact on their financial management skills in adulthood. While some assert that this practice instills invaluable habits conducive to effective money management later in life, others question its efficacy. This essay will critically examine both viewpoints before presenting a nuanced perspective.

Advocates of providing children with pocket money contend that it serves as a practical tool for imparting essential financial literacy from a young age. By receiving a regular allowance, children are afforded the opportunity to learn budgeting, saving, and responsible spending habits. This hands-on experience with money empowers them to understand the value of financial planning and cultivates a sense of accountability for their expenditures, thereby laying a solid foundation for sound financial decision-making in adulthood.

Conversely, critics argue that the mere act of providing pocket money may not guarantee the development of robust financial management skills in adulthood. They posit that the amount of pocket money given may be insufficient to instil meaningful lessons about financial responsibility. Moreover, the absence of guidance and supervision on how to utilise pocket money effectively may lead to the formation of detrimental spending habits or a lack of appreciation for the importance of saving and investing for the future.

In my view, while giving children pocket money can serve as a valuable means of introducing financial concepts and fostering independence, its effectiveness hinges on various factors. The amount of pocket money provided, coupled with the guidance and support offered by parents or guardians, plays a pivotal role in shaping children's attitudes toward money. Additionally, supplementary financial education programs or discussions about budgeting and saving can complement the practice of giving pocket money and amplify its impact on children's financial literacy.

In conclusion, while some argue that providing children with pocket money facilitates the development of effective money management skills in adulthood, others remain skeptical about its efficacy. Ultimately, the extent to which pocket money influences financial behavior in adulthood is contingent upon the amount given, the quality of parental guidance, and the presence of supplementary financial education initiatives. Therefore, while giving pocket money may be beneficial, it should be accompanied by comprehensive support and education to maximize its potential impact on children's financial well-being.
(340 words)